you wouldn't even know I had abused them so badly, so yeah, pretty happy with that. being a course car on a state championship car rally in a forest where it is 100% full throttle everywhere, there were no gashes, missing tread blocks, not ripped of corners even after doing the full 300km rally course 8 times over the 3 days of the rally. But for high speed driving on gravel on closed roads - i.e. Turn in - where ATs often suffer due to tread block squirm - isn't even noticeable.ĭownside - they will slip and slide around on clay and mud, so if you are flying down a forest road in a hurry and hit a slippy patch, the cross your fingers and hope for the best cos these tread blocks can't bite through.Īs for long term tyre wear durability, I haven't a clue. Well yes, they are significantly superior to BF Goodrigh ATs of about 10 years ago (last time I had them) and there was no noticeable ride comfort issue nor road noise coming from the tread blocks. Some car magazine reviews of the GG AT3 suggested they were very good too, so what the hell, lets get a set. In our lab tests, Tire models like the Grabber Arctic are rated on multiple criteria, such as those listed below. Read more here really are only 2 options for the Land Rover Disco 3 if you want to meet all load, speed and dimensions of the original equipment. The General Grabber Arctic is part of the Tire test program at Consumer Reports.

I was going to run BFGs again, but the General Grabber AT3 are about $100 cheaper, and are standard equipment on some Jeeps, so I thought 'how bad can they be'. (sharp gravel sliced the sidewall and I could put my hand through the hole.) I've run BF Goodrich ATs (BFGs) in the past on a previous 4wd, and they were a very good tyre, with reasonable road noise, good turn in and of course, good grip on gravel. I switched out a set of road tyres for some all-terrain tyres after getting a sidewall ripped out on a forestry road.

Tire grabber